Adyghe Int. Sci. J. Vol. 22, No 4. P. 76-89. ISSN 1726-9946
Read article Contents of this issue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2022-22-4-76-89
PHILOSOPHY
| Original Article |
Genderology in the problems and prospects of the development of ethnological science
Khazhismel Gisovich Tkhagapsoev
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H. M. Berbekov (173, Chernyshevsky st., Nalchik, 360004, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic), ORCID 0000-0001-5778-5265, SPIN 9020-2220, gapsara@ramblcr.ru
Abstract. The article is devoted to the problems of the development of ethnology within the framework of the modern paradigm of human sciences and scientific and humanitarian knowledge. Particular attention is paid to the potential role of ideas, principles and cognitive methods of gender studies in the development of ethnological science. A number of examples demonstrate the fundamental difference in the interpretation of the same phenomena of culture and gender existence of the Caucasian ethnic groups within the framework of ethnology and from the point of view of gcndcrology. It is emphasized that when considered on the basis of gendcrology, the usual phenomena of ethnic cultures appear in a new light, requiring re-reading, rethinking and re-evaluation. This concerns the meanings and genesis of traditions, forms and norms of public communication between men and women, the status of men and women in culture, the interpretation of the cultural and symbolic world of an ethnic group, as well as the social and semantic dimensions of ethno-fiction, including in retrospect.
Keywords: ethnos, cultureethnology, gender, gender, sociocultural gender, gender relations, gender asymmetry, gender studies, cultural studies, ethnic literary criticism
Acknowledgments: the author are thankful to the anonymous reviewer for his valuable remakes.
For citation. Kh. G. Tkhagapsoev Genderology in the problems and prospects of the development of ethnological science. Adyghe Int. Sei. J. 2022. Vol. 22, No. 4. P. 76-89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2022-22-4-76-89
The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Submitted 15.11.2022; approved after reviewing 09.12.2022; aeeepted for publication 12.12.2022
© Tkhagapsoev Kh. G., 2022
REFERENCES
1. V. I. Abaev Izbrannye trudy. Religiya. Fol’klor. Literatura. [Selected works. Religion. Folklore. Literature]. Vladikavkaz, cd. «IR>, 1990. 640 p.
2. A. M. Gadagatl’ Geroicheskij epos narty adygskih(cherkesskih) narodov [Gadagatl A.M. The heroic epos of the Narts of the Adyghe (Circassian) peoples]. Maikop, 1987. 406 p.
3. Narody Kavkaza (pod red. S. P. Tolstova) [Peoples of the Caucasus (under the editorship of
S. P. Tolstov)]. M., cd. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1960. 622 p.
4. Istoriya narodov Scvcrnogo Kavkaza s drevnejshih vremen do konca XVIII veka [History of the peoples of the North Caucasus from ancient times to the end of the 18th century]. M., cd. Science, 1988. 544 p.
5. V. A. Shevlokov, V. H. Balatokov Sinergeticheskaya koncepciya etnosa: postanovka problem [Synergetic concept of ethnos: statement of the problem // Sat. scientific articles «World of ethnos»]. Nalchik, cd. «El-Fa», 1999. P. 30-57.
6. V. A. Shevlokov Etnosocial’naya evolyuciya: sinergeticheskij aspect [Ethno-social evolution: synergetic aspect]. Doklady AMAN, 2005, vol. 7, № 2. P. 153—161.
7. Z. H. Bizheva Kul’turnye koncepty v kabardinskom yazyke [Cultural concepts in the Kabardian language]. Nalchik, cd. KBGU, 1997. 140 p.
8. H. G. Thagapsoev Scmiozis kavkazskoj poezii sovetskoj epohi как forma ob’cktivacii kul’turnogo soznaniya ctnosov [Scmiosis of the Caucasian poetry of the Soviet era as a form of objectification of the cultural consciousness of ethnic groups]. Regions of Russia: Artistic Processes of Modern and Modern Times (Collection of scientific articles). St. Petersburg, «Alcthcya», 2002. P. 104-118.
9. L. M. Siyuhova Koncept nochi v tradicionnoj adygskoj kul’turc [The concept of the night in traditional Adyghe culture]. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University 2011, № 2. P. 41-47.
10. H. G. Thagapsoev Lektonicheskij tip kommunikacii i problema civilizacionnoj identichnosti Kavkaza [Lektonic type of communication and the problem of civilizational identity of the Caucasus]. Scientific Thought of the Caucasus, 2001, № 4. P. 56-64.
11. Kh. G. Tkhagapsoev Etiquette, ethics or local civilization? – to the essence and name of the traditional socio-cultural life of the Circassians/Caucasians. Adyghe hit. Sei. J. 2022. Vol. 22, No. 2. P. 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2022-22-2-89-100.
12. Gender как instrument poznaniya i preobrazovaniya obshchcstva (Sb. statcj pod red. Voroninoj O.A.) [Gender as an instrument of cognition and transformation of society (Collection of articles edited by Voronina OA)]. M., cd. «MCGI-Soltex», 2006. 215 p.
13. G. G. Silaste Gcndcrnaya sociologiya i rossijskaya rcal’nost’ [Gender sociology and Russian reality], M., Alfa-VI, 2016. 640 p.
14. H. G. Thagapsoev, A. YU. SHadzhe, N. A. Il’inova, E. S. Kukva, Z. CH. Taukanova Detcrminaciya gcndcra etnichcskim faktorom: kavkazskij diskurs [Determination of gender by the ethnic factor: Caucasian discourse]. Moscow: SputnikV Publishing House, 2019. 134 p.
15. N. L. Pushkareva Gcndcrnaya tcoriya i istorichcskoc znanie [Gender theory and historical knowledge]. St. Petersburg: Aletcyya, 2007. 496 p.
16. M. A. Tekueva Muzhchina i zhenshchina v adygskoj kul’ture: tradicii i sovremennost’ [Man and woman in the Adyghe culture: traditions and modernity]. Nalchik: «El-fa», 2006. 260 p.
17. L. H. Sabanchieva Gender v social’no-politicheskih proccssah Kabardino-Balkarii [Gender in the socio-political processes of Kabardino-Balkaria]. Nalchik, KBIGI, 2016. 156 p.
18. N. O. Adibekyan Istorizm gendcrologizacii feminizma [Historicism of the gendcrologisation of feminism]. Bulletin of the Saratov State University, 2009, № 1. P. 150-157.
19. Simona de Bovuar [Simone de Beauvoir], Second floor. SPb. Ed. «Alcthcia», 1997. 832 p.
20. B. G. Ashkhotov Muzykal’naya Nartiada: opyt isslcdovaniya [Musical Nartiada: research experience]. Nalchik: Print Center, 2020. 380 p.
21. E. Zareckij Feminnost’ /maskulinnost’: kross-kul’turnyj analiz na primere Rossii i FRG [Feminiiiity/masculinity: cross-cultural analysis on the example of Russia and Germany]. Electronic resource https://www.rescarchgatc.net// Femininity.
22. H. G. Thagapsoev К osobennostyam social ’nogo bytiya sovremennoj Rossii [On the peculiarities of the social life of modern Russia], Philosophical Sciences, 2007, № 9. P. 48—66.
23. H. G. Thagapsoev Etnoctatizm как inobytic Rossijskogo fedcralizma [Ethnoctatism as the Other Being of Russian Federalism]. Scientific Thought of the Caucasus. 2002. № 3. P. 25-33
24. H. G. Thagapsoev Kommunikativnye osobennosti bespis’mennyh kul’tur [Communicative features of non-litcratc cultures]. Scientific Thought of the Caucasus. 2000. № 2. P. 46—52.
25. H. G. Thagapsoev Paradigmal’nyj podhod v obrazovanii: к problcmam stanovlcniya [Paradigm approach in education: to the problems of formation]. Pedagogy, 2014, № 5. P. 8-17.
26. M. B. Sapunov, H. G. Thagapsoev Kul’tura kriticheskogo diskursa о vysshem obrazovanii i nauke [Culture of critical discourse on higher education and science]. Higher education in Russia, 2018, V. 27, № 7. P. 20-27.
27. Kh. G. Tkhagapsoev Sec culture from its hidden corncrs-in the name of culture (Review of the monograph by L. F. Kharacva and Z. A. Kuchukova «Gender and Ethnogender». Nalchik: Print Center. 2018.192 p.). Reports Adyghe (Circassian) International Academy of Sciences. 2021, vol. 21, No. 3. P. 91-98. DOI: 10.47928/1726-9946-2021-21-3-91-98
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.