Adyghe Int. Sci. J. Vol. 23. No 1. P. 86-98
Read article Contents of this issue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2023-23-1-86-98
EDN: LJVJNZ
PHILOSOPHY
| Original Article |
Ethnos as a subject of history and a measure of the objectivity of historical science
Khazhismel Gisovich Tkhagapsoev
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H. M. Berbekov (173, Chernyshevsky st., Nalchik, 360004, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic), ORCID 0000-0001-5778-5265, SPIN-код 9020-2220, gapsara@ramblcr.ru
Abstract. The article is devoted to methodological problems, the solution of which determines the correspondence of ethno-historiography to the modern level of science, its further successful development. It is shown that she adheres to outdated views on the structure, subjectivity and role of traditional society in the historical process; docs not take into account the new views of philosophy and the theory of history on the essence of local civilization, the mechanisms of its existence, its role and significance in historical processes. It docs not pay due attention to the factor of interethnic relations and their specific (in particular, local civilizational) forms in historical processes. As a result, ethnohistoriography reflects the subjectivity of the ethnos in history only partially. It is also noted that discourses about the processes of formation and development of Russian civilization are contradictory, while ignoring the role and place of ethnic groups in these issues and the lack of representation of ethnic historiography in the discourses themselves about the processes of formation of this civilization.
Keywords: ethnos, historiography, ethnic historiography, historical process factors, local civilization, sub-civilization, Russian civilization
Acknowledgments: the author arc thankful to the anonymous reviewer for his valuable remakes.
For citation. Tkhagapsoev Kh. G. Ethnos as a subject of history and a measure of the objectivity of historical science. Adyghe Int. Sei. J. 2023. Vol. 23, No. 1. Pp. 86-98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2023-23-l-86-98; EDN: LJVJNZ
The author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Submitted 08.02.2023; approved after reviewing 16.02.2023; aeeepted for publication 20.02.2023
© Tkhagapsoev Kh. G., 2023
REFERENCES
1. Smolensky I. I. Teoriya i metodologiya istorii. [Theory and methodology of history]. M., publishing center «Academy», 2012. 272 p.
2. Tkhagapsoev Kh. G. Etiquette, ethics or local civilization? – to the essence and name of the traditional socio-cultural life of the Circassians/Caucasians. Adyghe hit. Sei. J. 2022. Vol. 22, No. 2. P. 89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47928/1726-9946-2022-22-2-89-100
3. Arutyunov S. A., Cheboksarov N. N. Peredacha informatsii как mekhanizm sushchestvovaniya etno-sotsial’nykh i biologicheskikh grupp chelovechestva [Information transfer as a mechanism for the existence of ethno-social and biological groups of mankind]. Races and peoples. Issue 2. M., «Nauka», 1972. P. 8-30.
4. Tkhagapsoev Kh. G. Kommunikativnyye osobennosti bespis’mennykh kul’tur [Communicative features of non-literate cultures]. Scientific thought of the Caucasus. 2000. No. 2. P. 46-54.
5. Rozov N. S. Filosofiya i teoriya istorii. [Philosophy and theory of history], M., cd. «Academy». 2018. 470p.
6. Huntington S. Stolknoveniye tsivilizatsiy [Clash of Civilizations]. M., cd. «AST». 2003. 603 p.
7. Lipkin A. I. Ponyatiya «etnos», «narod», «natsiya»-kul’turotsentricheskiy vzglyad [The concepts of «ethnos», «people», «nation» – a culture-centric view ]. Resource https: / / niipt.ru/education/ethnos.php
8. Tishkov V. A. Rekviyem po etnosu. [Requiem for the ethnos]. M., «Nauka». 2021. 543 p.
9. Filipov V. R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa [Soviet theory of ethnos]. M., cd. IARAN, 2010. 185 p.
10. Istoriya narodov Severnogo Kavkaza s drevneyshikh vrenien do kontsa 18 v.(pod redaktsiyey Piotrovskogo B.B.) [History of the peoples of the North Caucasus from ancient times to the end of the 18th century (edited by Piotrovsky B.B.)], M., cd. «Science». 1988. 549 p.
11. Toynbee A. Issledovaniye istorii: vozniknoveniye, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy. [Research of history: the emergence, growth and decay of civilizations]. M., cd. «AST». 2009. 670 p.
12. Moiseeva L. A. Istoriya tsivilizatsiy.. [History of civilizations]. Rostov/on Don, «Phoenix». 2000. 300 p.
13. Tkhagapsoev Kh.G. Gatiatulina E. Identichnost’: к problemam metodologii [Identity: to the problems of methodology]. Scientific Thought of the Caucasus. 2010. No. 4 (64). Pp. 16-23.
14. Sokurov V. N. Cherkesskiy kondot’yer Ivana Groznogo [Circassian condottiere of Ivan the Terrible]. Motherland, 2011, No. 11. Pp. 55-59.
15. Mirzoev A. S. Institut vyyczda na sluzhbu i voyennoye otkhodnichcstvo как chast’ kul’tury cherkesov [The institution of departure for service and military otkhodnichcstvo as part of the culture of the Circassians]. Kavkazologiya. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 26-66.
16. Lubsky A. V. Gosudarstvo-tsivilizatsiya i natsional’no-tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost’ Rossii [State-civilization and national-civilizational identity of Russia]. Humanist of the South of Russia. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 30-45.
17. Sapunov M. B. Tkhagapsoev H. G. Kul’tura kriticheskogo diskursa v vysshem obrazovanii i nauke [Culture of critical discourse in higher education and science]. Higher education in Russia. 2018. No. 7. Pp. 20-27.
18. Tkhagapsoev Kh. G. Etno-ctatizm как inobytiyc rossiyskogo fedcralizma [Ethno-ctatism as a different existence of Russian federalism]. Scientific Thought of the Caucasus, 2002. No. 3. Pp. 9-17.
19. Barkov F. A., Tkhagapsoev H. G., Chernous V. V. Etnosy v global’nom mire. [Etlinoi in the global world]. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University, 2009, 162 p.
20. Tkhagapsoev Kh. G. Kavkazskaya kul’tura: osobennosti genezisa i tendentsii razvitiya. [Caucasian culture: features of genesis and development trends]. SPb, cd. «Asterion», 2008. 222 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.